translation-research-summer-school-banner-2026 translation-research-summer-school-banner-2026
book-solid-full
calendar-solid-full
file-signature-solid-full
location-dot-solid-full

The 2026 Translation Research Summer School, scheduled for 6-11 July 2026, will consist of five taught modules:

  • Module 1 | Theoretical Approaches
  • Module 2 | Research Methods in Translation Studies
  • Module 3 | Research Design and Dynamics
  • Module 4 | Featured Theme: Translation and Technology: Contemporary and Historical Perspectives
  • Module 5 | Academic Career Development

Each taught module encompasses three contact hours and six hours of guided reading. During the School, participants attend two interactive 90-minute sessions (from the same or different modules) every day.

The School also hosts a number of group tutorials, offering participants further opportunities to engage in more depth with a wide range of topics and discuss their own research with tutors and their peers. Each participant will have the opportunity to select and attend three group tutorials during the School.

On the final day, participants (in pathway 1) will present their work to fellow students and staff and receive oral feedback. The submission of written work after the summer is required to be awarded a completion certificate.

MODULE 1 | Theoretical Approaches

Session 1A | Maialen Marin-Lacarta
Translation and Materiality

In media studies, as early as the 1950s and 1960s scholars began to challenge the view of media as neutral containers for storing and transmitting content. McLuhan (1964) famously argued that “the medium is the message”, emphasizing that technologies themselves — rather than the content they carry — should be the primary focus of study. Translation studies took up questions of materiality more recently, particularly from the 2010s onward, through the work of scholars such as Karin Littau and Anne Coldiron. Littau was among the first in the field to argue that “[m]edia actively shape our perceptions and consequently also our mindsets, not through the content they carry, but through their material and technical properties” (2016: 87, italics in original). This session will engage with key debates sparked by Littau’s 2016 article, entitled ‘Translation and the materialities of communication’, and the responses it generated, highlighting questions of materiality and non-human agency that remain highly relevant today. We will also discuss more recent contributions from Littau (2022) and O’Connor (2022). Through specific examples of books, images and other artifacts, the session will explore theoretical questions concerning the materiality of translations, the role of tools in understanding translation as a material practice, and contemporary debates surrounding the non-human agency of tools and objects. 

 

Session 1B |  Sue-Ann Harding
Translation, Technology and the Lodestar of Justice

This session offers an examination and exploration of the concept of justice:  what it means, how it is understood and applied in various disciplines, including Translation Studies, and how we might use it as a guiding concept in our research and translation practices, particularly in relation to our technological tools and the technological meshworks in which we are all embedded. Beyond the legal frameworks of nation states and international bodies, the concept is increasingly used to specify sites of inequalities and thus coalesce efforts for positive, and just, change. Activists and policy makers, for example, talk about social justice, language justice, environmental justice, transitional justice, epistemic justice, and tech justice, all of which are deeply entangled with translation. Drawing on selected key texts from our field and beyond that critically engage with ethics and rights, the session invites students to reflect on our intersectional positions in relation to current technological tools and systems, reflecting on how we might be guided by a central concept of justice as we use, navigate, challenge and re-imagine these tools and systems in our translation scholarship and practice.

 

MODULE 2 | Research Methods in Translation Studies

Session 2A | Maialen Marin-Lacarta
Collaborative Translation and Technology

The stereotypical image of the lonely translator, especially within literary translation, has been debunked by researchers who investigate the collaborative nature of translation (Cordingley and Frigau Manning 2017). The use of technology as a collaborative tool has further expanded the possibilities of collective translation practices, enabling new forms of interaction between translators, communities and machines. After introducing various historical instances of collaborative translation, this session will examine the diverse definitions encompassed by this umbrella term. We will explore the reasons for scholars’ delayed focus on the collaborative nature of translation by situating this subdiscipline within the historical development of Translation Studies as a field. In addition, we will delve into the various subcategories and nuanced meanings associated with this meta-concept (Zwischenberger 2022), such as crowdsourcing, volunteer translation, community translation and user-generated translation, among others. Drawing on authentic examples from research that examines collaborative translation in different areas, the session will cover questions of research design, data collection and analysis. Additionally, we will discuss how a collaborative understanding of translation can help us investigate the interaction between humans and technology in the translation process, especially in an era where advancements like neural machine-translation and Artificial Intelligence are transforming the profession. Finally, the session will also touch upon the social and ethical consequences of collaborative translation, particularly in the context of studies on volunteer translation, profit-driven crowdsourcing, and machine-centred collaboration.

 

Session 2B | Kyung Hye Kim
Corpus Building and Research in the Age of AI

Corpus-based methodology has proven to be a powerful tool of analysis in translation and interpreting studies, particularly in contrastive and diachronic analysis: from the analysis of translation and language contact and change (Malamatidou 2016) to investigations into institutional translators’ mediation of Chinese political discourse (Pan, Fu and Li 2023) and conceptual analysis (Karimullah 2020; Buts et al. 2021). Although the design of a corpus will vary depending on the specific research questions scholars set out to address, collecting authentic, naturally occurring text – of real-life language use – to be stored in a machine-readable form, is a crucial prerequisite for any corpus-based research. Establishing thorough and appropriate text selection criteria to ensure the representativeness of the sample texts chosen is also essential as this forms the foundation for the interpretation of the linguistic patterns identified in the analysis.

However, as Buts (2025) rightly points out, the notions of representativeness and text authenticity are being seriously challenged in the current era of generative AI. With AI now deeply embedded in our daily practices, including collecting, generating, editing, processing, and translating both texts and images, what constitutes an ‘authentic’ and ‘representative’ text has become increasingly problematic. The rapid proliferation of AI-generated and AI-translated content raises critical questions about the very nature of the data we analyse, as the line between human- and machine-translated text is becoming ever more blurred. In this context, it is difficult, for example, to argue that the patterns identified are truly representative of human communication and to determine whose voice and whose style are being represented – whether that of the original human author or the machine translator. Against this backdrop, this session will critically re-examine the definition and purpose of corpus-based research in light of the challenges posed by AI and the digital age. It will also discuss the theoretical implications of the new landscape and suggest new avenues for translation studies research, focusing on issues of data authenticity, methodological adaptation, and ethical concerns.

 

MODULE 3 | Research Design and Dynamics

Session 3A | Sue-Ann Harding
Research in Digitized Archives: Dangers, Delights, Diversion and Discovery

This session is an invitation to students to consider archives, especially digitized archives and online collections of written texts, images and maps, as potentially rich sources of material for their research, even if they don’t think of themselves as primarily historians or researchers of translation history. We will look briefly at this growing area, including ways in which scholars have used archives to not only research translators and translations (Munday 2014, Paloposki 2016), but also to critique ways in which archives themselves, with their diversity of organization, cataloguing, restrictions and accessibility, are translations of history, memory and the past (Footitt 2022, Strowe 2021, Constanza Guzmán 2020). Such studies are often motivated by a curiosity about what is missing and a political intention to seek out and make visible people, places and narratives commonly overlooked and dismissed by more mainstream, reductionist accounts of the past (Atefmehr & Farahzad 2021). Drawing on two research projects of my own that extensively use digitised archives and online collections and are also driven by that same curiosity and political intention, the session will introduce some key online collections that students might find useful and intriguing and track some of the rewarding and frustrating moments of the (often invisible) research process to map out how we might find, navigate, critique, use and translate such available materials in our scholarship.

 

Session 3B | Robert Neather
Researching Translation, Extinction and Climate Change in the Museum: The Design and Execution of a Funded Project

Extinction and climate change have become issues of increasing importance across the public sphere. As institutions that are major drivers of public narratives, museums seek to grapple with how best to frame these issues of ecological disaster. They must consider how to balance competing needs for scientific rigour, affective engagement and meaningful action while also negotiating the potential for fuelling eco-anxiety or again being seen as overly politically active within their often government- and donor-sponsored contexts. Translation studies has likewise seen a growth of interest in climate change, and has also developed a solid body of research on translation in museums. However, questions surrounding the translation of extinction and ecological disaster in the museum context have only recently begun to be addressed.

This session examines the case of a recently completed funded project undertaken to address this research gap. In approaching the translation of extinction and climate change, the project understands translation as a broad category, in which interlingual translation is only one component in the overall translation of knowledge that happens in a museum exhibition. The session will give an account of the project from the design of the research proposal on paper to its actual execution, which involved certain adjustments in direction and approach as the research developed. It thus seeks both to give a sense of how research design works in the context of a funding proposal, and how it plays out in practice as particular issues arise.

 

MODULE 4 | Featured Theme:
Translation and Technology: Contemporary and Historical Perspectives

Session 4A | Mona Baker
Translation and Technology: Past and Present

Following Williams (1974) and Castells (1996), this session will explore the trajectory of key technological advances in recent history, including AI, and their complex interaction with the job market and living standards, with particular reference to the translation and interpreting profession. Despite the current hype surrounding AI, our experience of technological advances in relatively recent history suggests that a deterministic model of the potential impact of AI may not prove realistic. Such a model would assume that AI will determine the conditions for social and political change, including change in the labour market and in the extent to which translators can exercise agency. An alternative model of technology might assume that AI is a symptom rather than a determinant of social change, a by-product of a preset course of social progress. The purposes to which AI is put would in this sense have been foreseen and required by this already unfolding social and political process. Both scenarios leave the profession with little room for manoeuvre or ability to resist the negative impact of AI. Following both Castells and Williams, however, it is possible to acknowledge that technologies like AI are often developed by powerful actors, with the support of the state and big business and with specific purposes in mind. At the same time, technologies can also be adapted by social actors in ways that diverge from and may even undermine the purposes for which they were developed. This opens up the possibility of adapting to the technology in order to survive and prosper in the new AI environment, and at the same time critiquing it and seeking to adapt it to varying degrees in some contexts and resist it altogether in situations where working with it would directly undercut the autonomy and welfare of its users or participate in the exploitation of others.
 

Session 4B | Mona Baker
Translation, Sustainability and Technology

AI-generated and machine translation are increasingly called upon to provide immediate, multilingual dissemination of data in a growing number of venues. They are promoted in part through a rhetoric of equity, despite the considerable volume of literature that outlines some of the ways in which they exacerbate already entrenched inequities in the global circulation of knowledge (Bowker 2025). AI and machine translation can deliver large quantities of research and other types of data in multiple languages almost instantaneously, and at low cost compared to human labour. But behind the rhetoric of equity and diversity and the attendant freemium interfaces presented to the public and the scientific community lies an unethical and extractive model of translation and authorship that has unprecedented environmental, labour, and cultural costs (Boéri and Baker 2025). Studies of translators’ responses to the rise of generative AI, moreover, suggest that they do not trust this technology and have concerns about how their data is appropriated and used to undercut their livelihood, rendering the entire profession unsustainable in future. This session will outline some of the main areas of concern in the development and use of generative AI models, focusing on issues of equity and environmental cost, and their implications for the future of the profession.

 

MODULE 5 | Academic Career Development

Session 5A | Kyung Hye Kim
Publishing in International Journals

Publishing in peer-reviewed international journals has become key to progress in an academic career, but this endeavour can be very stressful, especially for early-career researchers. Identifying a suitable outlet, pitching it at the right level, responding to review comments, writing a rebuttal letter, and communicating with editors during revision processes can be challenging as well. Moreover, some of the research assessment systems of academic institutions emphasise quantity over quality or even disregard book chapters and articles published in non-SSCI/A&HCI indexed journals. Certain academic institutions attach more importance to publishing outside primary fields of study, yet the different expectations and writing styles of each journal often mean that none of these related fields appreciate interdisciplinary work.

On the basis of the presenter’s experience as an editor, peer reviewer and author who has worked in higher education institutions with such a system, this session will cover the entire publishing process—from writing a paper in English, implementing strategic measures to find an appropriate journal, submitting manuscripts and undergoing review stages to dealing with rejection. The session will also include a discussion of (un)solicited book reviews and publishing beyond the field of translation studies, particularly in journals associated with other disciplinary domains that are potentially of interest to audiovisual and media translation scholars.

 

Session 5B | Maialen Marin-Lacarta
Applying for External Funding for Research Projects

After the completion of their doctoral studies, academics are required to apply for competitive research grants throughout their career, from individual projects to collaborative grants as their career progresses. Obtaining external funding for research projects is often a job prerequisite, and junior academics may lose their jobs if they fail. Based on the presenter’s experience in Hong Kong and Europe, this session will discuss best practices for developing successful proposals in the field of Translation and Interpreting. Special attention will be paid to various key elements that are becoming indispensable: interdisciplinarity, collaboration, novelty, feasibility and impact. The session will address issues such as finding suitable grants and funding agencies, choosing when to apply, identifying a project topic, preparing an application, and writing and structuring proposals. Through the analysis of project abstracts, participants will learn to identify strengths and weaknesses of project proposals. The session will draw on authentic examples of grants awarded by funding bodies in Hong Kong (University Grants Committee), Spain (Ministry of Science and Innovation) and Europe (European Research Council, Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions), and that investigate a variety of themes such as translation in international NGOs, national politics and the reception of Russian literature in English, and digital translations and the production of knowledge.

Provisional topics include:

  • Literature, Translation and Authenticity (Sue-Ann Harding)
  • Digital Paratexts (Sue-Ann Harding)
  • Translation and the Environment (Sue-Ann Harding)
  • Translation and the Creative Arts (Kyunghye Kim)
  • Translation, Technology and Memory (Kyunghye Kim)
  • News Translation in the Age of AI (Kyunghye Kim)
  • Global Translation Markets (Maialen Marin-Lacarta)
  • Sociology of Translation (Maialen Marin-Lacarta)
  • Agency: Human and Non-Human (Maialen Marin-Lacarta)
  • Corpus Compilation and Analysis: Impact of New Technologies (Mona Baker)
  • Narrative Theory: Narrative Accrual in the Age of AI (Mona Baker)
  • Translation, Activism and Technology (Mona Baker)

22 October 2025: Application period opens
Mid-March 2026: Early registration period opens
1 June 2026: Late registration period opens
23 June 2026: Late registration ends 

Registration fees in Hong Kong dollars (HKD) for TRSS 2026 are as follows:

 Student (HKD)Standard (HKD)
Early-bird (On or before 31 May 2026)5,0005,000
Late (On or before 23 June 2026)5,5006,000


The registration fee covers attendance at the School, refreshments every day, and a social event during the week. It does not cover accommodation, lunch or dinner. 

The registration page will be launched in mid-March 2026.

As part of the application process, and prior to registration, all participants are required to submit a Personal Statement outlining the reasons for and scope of their interest in the topics to be covered in the School. Applicants should submit their personal statement at this online platform.

Hong Kong Baptist University (HKBU) Kowloon Tong Campus, comprising three campuses namely Baptist University Road Campus (BURC), Ho Sin Hang Campus (HSHC), and Shaw Campus (SHAW), is located right in the middle of the vibrant city and is well-served by public transport. 

TRSS 2026 will be held on the Shaw Campus (SHAW).

Hotel Recommendations**
The following hotels are within a 30-minute travel time from the HKBU campus:

Room rates of these hotels can be found on the hotel websites or most hotel booking platforms.

**This list of nearby hotels is provided for your convenience. The University does not endorse any specific hotel and is not a party to any agreements made between guests and the hotel or booking platform. All booking and payment arrangements must be made directly.

Getting to Shaw Campus (SHAW), HKBU by Mass Transit Railway (MTR)

The nearest MTR station is Kowloon Tong Station. From there you can walk or take the minibus to our Kowloon Tong Campuses.

  • Walking (Takes roughly 10–15 mins):
    Exit from Exit A2
    Walk past Suffolk Road, turn into Waterloo Road (Northbound), turn right into Junction Road, and turn right again into Renfrew Road. SHAW Campus is on your left-hand side (opposite to the People’s Liberation Army Kowloon East Barracks)
  • Taking the minibus:
    Exit from Exit B or D to get to the green minibus station of the Kowloon Tong Public Transport Interchange. Take route no. 25M or 25MS.

 Link to HKBU Campus Map (PDF)
 Get Directions to HKBU on Google Map